A Manifesto! The Time Has Come!
Thursday October 15, 2009
I have made a decision. I will no longer debate the issue of homosexuality in the church with anyone. I will no longer engage the biblical ignorance that emanates from so many right-wing Christians about how the Bible condemns homosexuality, as if that point of view still has any credibility. I will no longer discuss with them or listen to them tell me how homosexuality is “an abomination to God,” about how homosexuality is a “chosen lifestyle,” or about how through prayer and “spiritual counseling” homosexual persons can be “cured.” Those arguments are no longer worthy of my time or energy. I will no longer dignify by listening to the thoughts of those who advocate “reparative therapy,” as if homosexual persons are somehow broken and need to be repaired. I will no longer talk to those who believe that the unity of the church can or should be achieved by rejecting the presence of, or at least at the expense of, gay and lesbian people. I will no longer take the time to refute the unlearned and undocumentable claims of certain world religious leaders who call homosexuality “deviant.” I will no longer listen to that pious sentimentality that certain Christian leaders continue to employ, which suggests some version of that strange and overtly dishonest phrase that “we love the sinner but hate the sin.” That statement is, I have concluded, nothing more than a self-serving lie designed to cover the fact that these people hate homosexual persons and fear homosexuality itself, but somehow know that hatred is incompatible with the Christ they claim to profess, so they adopt this face-saving and absolutely false statement. I will no longer temper my understanding of truth in order to pretend that I have even a tiny smidgen of respect for the appalling negativity that continues to emanate from religious circles where the church has for centuries conveniently perfumed its ongoing prejudices against blacks, Jews, women and homosexual persons with what it assumes is “high-sounding, pious rhetoric.” The day for that mentality has quite simply come to an end for me. I will personally neither tolerate it nor listen to it any longer. The world has moved on, leaving these elements of the Christian Church that cannot adjust to new knowledge or a new consciousness lost in a sea of their own irrelevance. They no longer talk to anyone but themselves. I will no longer seek to slow down the witness to inclusiveness by pretending that there is some middle ground between prejudice and oppression. There isn’t. Justice postponed is justice denied. That can be a resting place no longer for anyone. An old civil rights song proclaimed that the only choice awaiting those who cannot adjust to a new understanding was to “Roll on over or we’ll roll on over you!” Time waits for no one.
I will particularly ignore those members of my own Episcopal Church who seek to break away from this body to form a “new church,” claiming that this new and bigoted instrument alone now represents the Anglican Communion. Such a new ecclesiastical body is designed to allow these pathetic human beings, who are so deeply locked into a world that no longer exists, to form a community in which they can continue to hate gay people, distort gay people with their hopeless rhetoric and to be part of a religious fellowship in which they can continue to feel justified in their homophobic prejudices for the rest of their tortured lives. Church unity can never be a virtue that is preserved by allowing injustice, oppression and psychological tyranny to go unchallenged.
In my personal life, I will no longer listen to televised debates conducted by “fair-minded” channels that seek to give “both sides” of this issue “equal time.” I am aware that these stations no longer give equal time to the advocates of treating women as if they are the property of men or to the advocates of reinstating either segregation or slavery, despite the fact that when these evil institutions were coming to an end the Bible was still being quoted frequently on each of these subjects. It is time for the media to announce that there are no longer two sides to the issue of full humanity for gay and lesbian people. There is no way that justice for homosexual people can be compromised any longer.
I will no longer act as if the Papal office is to be respected if the present occupant of that office is either not willing or not able to inform and educate himself on public issues on which he dares to speak with embarrassing ineptitude. I will no longer be respectful of the leadership of the Archbishop of Canterbury, who seems to believe that rude behavior, intolerance and even killing prejudice is somehow acceptable, so long as it comes from third-world religious leaders, who more than anything else reveal in themselves the price that colonial oppression has required of the minds and hearts of so many of our world’s population. I see no way that ignorance and truth can be placed side by side, nor do I believe that evil is somehow less evil if the Bible is quoted to justify it. I will dismiss as unworthy of any more of my attention the wild, false and uninformed opinions of such would-be religious leaders as Pat Robertson, James Dobson, Jerry Falwell, Jimmy Swaggart, Albert Mohler, and Robert Duncan. My country and my church have both already spent too much time, energy and money trying to accommodate these backward points of view when they are no longer even tolerable.
I make these statements because it is time to move on. The battle is over. The victory has been won. There is no reasonable doubt as to what the final outcome of this struggle will be. Homosexual people will be accepted as equal, full human beings, who have a legitimate claim on every right that both church and society have to offer any of us. Homosexual marriages will become legal, recognized by the state and pronounced holy by the church. “Don’t ask, don’t tell” will be dismantled as the policy of our armed forces. We will and we must learn that equality of citizenship is not something that should ever be submitted to a referendum. Equality under and before the law is a solemn promise conveyed to all our citizens in the Constitution itself. Can any of us imagine having a public referendum on whether slavery should continue, whether segregation should be dismantled, whether voting privileges should be offered to women? The time has come for politicians to stop hiding behind unjust laws that they themselves helped to enact, and to abandon that convenient shield of demanding a vote on the rights of full citizenship because they do not understand the difference between a constitutional democracy, which this nation has, and a “mobocracy,” which this nation rejected when it adopted its constitution. We do not put the civil rights of a minority to the vote of a plebiscite.
I will also no longer act as if I need a majority vote of some ecclesiastical body in order to bless, ordain, recognize and celebrate the lives and gifts of gay and lesbian people in the life of the church. No one should ever again be forced to submit the privilege of citizenship in this nation or membership in the Christian Church to the will of a majority vote.
The battle in both our culture and our church to rid our souls of this dying prejudice is finished. A new consciousness has arisen. A decision has quite clearly been made. Inequality for gay and lesbian people is no longer a debatable issue in either church or state. Therefore, I will from this moment on refuse to dignify the continued public expression of ignorant prejudice by engaging it. I do not tolerate racism or sexism any longer. From this moment on, I will no longer tolerate our culture’s various forms of homophobia. I do not care who it is who articulates these attitudes or who tries to make them sound holy with religious jargon.
I have been part of this debate for years, but things do get settled and this issue is now settled for me. I do not debate any longer with members of the “Flat Earth Society” either. I do not debate with people who think we should treat epilepsy by casting demons out of the epileptic person; I do not waste time engaging those medical opinions that suggest that bleeding the patient might release the infection. I do not converse with people who think that Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans as punishment for the sin of being the birthplace of Ellen DeGeneres or that the terrorists hit the United Sates on 9/11 because we tolerated homosexual people, abortions, feminism or the American Civil Liberties Union. I am tired of being embarrassed by so much of my church’s participation in causes that are quite unworthy of the Christ I serve or the God whose mystery and wonder I appreciate more each day. Indeed I feel the Christian Church should not only apologize, but do public penance for the way we have treated people of color, women, adherents of other religions and those we designated heretics, as well as gay and lesbian people.
Life moves on. As the poet James Russell Lowell once put it more than a century ago: “New occasions teach new duties, Time makes ancient good uncouth.” I am ready now to claim the victory. I will from now on assume it and live into it. I am unwilling to argue about it or to discuss it as if there are two equally valid, competing positions any longer. The day for that mentality has simply gone forever.
This is my manifesto and my creed. I proclaim it today. I invite others to join me in this public declaration. I believe that such a public outpouring will help cleanse both the church and this nation of its own distorting past. It will restore integrity and honor to both church and state. It will signal that a new day has dawned and we are ready not just to embrace it, but also to rejoice in it and to celebrate it.
– John Shelby Spong


5 responses so far ↓
hereinfranklin // October 26, 2009 at 4:22 pm
Oh, JD…mmmm. I decided a few years ago that I was going to focus my church life on the small picture–help people locally, teach by example, work with youth. I stayed away from the Gene Robinson fray, but was not, of course, ignorant of it.
I’m not familiar with Bishop Spong, but this piece is right up my alley–a little to the left, but by and large, it resonates with me.
Then I clicked on the link to his blog and was immediately turned off. It looks (and sounds) like any other money-grabbing enterprise out there. BUY THIS! ORDER THAT!
I’m all for people making money, but this just seems so tacky.
So I guess I just stick to my myopic view, safely hidden with my head in the sand.
jdhays // October 26, 2009 at 5:35 pm
If more church folks had your “myopia,” we’d not be dealing with the existing Episcopal schism nor the threatened Lutheran split. We’d just have lots of churches going about the Lord’s business in their respective corners of the world.
Yeah, John Shelby is out to make some money with his newsletter and his books, no doubt about it.
I’m not a newsletter subscriber, but I’ve enjoyed reading some of his books. He’s a challenging voice to the likes of John Hagee/Pat Robertson/Rod Parsley and even publicly debated the late Jerry Falwell a few times. He’s doing theology from the vantage point of what we theology geeks might call classic 20th century liberal theology. Next time you’re second-hand book shopping, be on the lookout for one his books in the religion section. “Rescuing the Bible From Fundamentalism” is a good intro to his way of thinking. “Why Christianity Must Change or Die” would give some entrenched church folks a pretty wild home perm if they read it.
But hey, keep up your own church doin’s just the way you are. It sure is needed right now.
Bishop Robinson can take care of himself.
justsally // October 26, 2009 at 7:19 pm
“I am a Christian,” declares John Shelby Spong, the now retired
Episcopal Bishop of Newark, N.J., in his most recent book A New
Christianity for a New World (HarperCollins, September, 2001) “Yet I do
not define God as a supernatural being … I do not believe in a deity
who can help a nation win a war … intervene to cure a loved one’s
sickness … I do not believe Jesus entered this world by a virgin
birth or did in any literal way raise the dead, overcome a medically
diagnosed paralysis, restore sight to a blind person … I do not
believe that a literal star guided literal wise men to bring Jesus
gifts or that literal angels sang to hillside shepherds to announce his
birth … I do not believe that the experience Christians celebrate at
Easter was the physical resuscitation of the three-days-dead body of
Jesus …”
A bishop of the Episcopal Church that essentiallys reverses the creeds is playing outside of the bounds of the Christian Church (and please know I think those are some pretty expansive boundaries) — so he can say whatever he wants to the world — but he’s lost his place to talk to the church because he no longer plays within the boundaries that define the church.
so basically I think it sounds like Spong. I don’t think he’s right. I think he’s being as prejudiced and as judgemental as those he accuses of being just that. It’s funny of all the people I know that didn’t vote for the consecration of Gene Robinson or those who are not proponents of same sex marriages in the church — I’ve never heard one of them “hate gays” or seek to “cure” gays or “distort” gays or declaire that gays are an “abomination” to God… But again I think he already took himself out of the game.
Honestly to choose to do what he wants and believes despite what people in authority over him might ask (including General Convention votes) then he should be defrocked. Because again if you’re going to be “episcopalian” you’ve got to play by the rules of the E. Church. This manifesto seems to me simply to say nothing more that I don’t care what anyone else says, I’m going to do what I think unilaterally.
bleh.
as if this is helpful?
Tineka Kurth // October 28, 2009 at 6:01 pm
I am a Mom of a young man who is homosexual. He found his love after college. He and his partner have created a business together, and have been living together as married for over 17 years. Everyone they come in contact is moved by their hospitality and kindness . They are blessings.
The church attitudes of intolerance have driven them into their own spiritual path outside the church. Why would any Christian want to drive people out of the church ? So only they can sit at the right hand of God?
Thank you Bishop Spong
jdhays // October 29, 2009 at 1:38 pm
Tineka, thanks for sharing your family story. Maybe someday they’ll feel welcomed and loved by a church community that understands these notions of hospitality and kindness are at the very core of Jesus’ ministry.